Les voitures grises sont les plus sûres du monde

[Breton]

http://europe.autonews.com/news.cms?newsId=5318

<!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->
Reuters / December 19, 2003

LONDON -- Silver colored vehicles are less likely than vehicles of other colors to be involved in a crash causing serious injuries, New Zealand scientists said on Friday.

About 3,000 people die in road traffic accidents around the world each day but researchers at the University of Auckland said the risk of being injured in a silver car was less than in cars of other colors.

"Silver cars were about 50 percent less likely to be involved in a crash resulting in serious injury than white cars," Sue Furness and her colleagues said in a report in The British Medical Journal.

The researchers studied the impact of car color on the risk of a serious injury in a study of more than 1,000 drivers in New Zealand between 1998 and 1999.

About half the drivers had been involved in a crash in which one or more occupants had been admitted to hospital or died while 571 had not had crashes and acted as a control group.

After taking into account factors such as the age and sex of the driver, the use of seat belts, the age of the vehicle and the road conditions, color still had an impact, researchers said.

The researchers said there was an increased risk of a serious injury in brown, black and green cars.

They did not explain why car color has an influence but said previous research suggested that white or light-colored cars are less likely to be involved in a crash than cars of other colors.

"Increasing the proportion of silver cars could be an effective passive strategy to reduce the burden of injury from car crashes," Furness added.
<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Les voitures les plus dangereuses : marron, noires et vertes <!--emo&-->[img]http://www.forum-autoroule.com/html/emoticons/vert.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='vert.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Conclusion : rendre obligatoire la "couleur" grise <!--emo&-->[img]http://www.forum-autoroule.com/html/emoticons/bien.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='bien.gif' /><!--endemo-->

[Stephp]

Il y avait déjà des expériences au states où à l'aube des 90's une compagnie avait des stats concernant les voitures rouges, qu'elle avait surtaxées, car plus accidentogènes (?).

A quand une étude sur les montes pneumatiques ?
Ou sur le type d'autoradio ?

Les nazis avant la WWII avait prouvé que le taux de globules rouges dans le sang des polonais était différent de celui ddu sang des bons aryens <!--emo&-->[img]http://www.forum-autoroule.com/html/emoticons/icon_redface.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='icon_redface.gif' /><!--endemo-->

Ou qqc comme ça.

Ca prouve quoi ?

L'année prochaine ce seront peut-être les bleues les plus accidentées.

[Gool]

jveux bien croire que les voitures noire sont plus accidentogenes.

Depuis que j'ai mon alfa noire en remplacement de ma Bx grise, je m'apercois que moins de gens me voient, de nuit comme de jour. (genre des gens qui veulent doubler/rabbatre par la droite alors que je suis la).

mais bon, laisser ses feux de positions voir de croisement toute la journée resoud le problème donc bon...


(desole pour les motos qui sont du coup moins voyantes, mais bon vu le proportion que je croise qui roulent deja pleins phrares, ou croisement reglés très haut... je pense pas que ca soit grave)